Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC

Call Us With Your Questions

917-338-3879
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Matthew F. Schwartz
    • John Ponterio
  • Practice Areas
    • Legal Malpractice
    • Copyright Law
    • Referrals For Legal Malpractice
    • Criminal Defense
  • Blog
  • Contact
Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC
917-338-3879
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Matthew F. Schwartz
    • John Ponterio
  • Practice Areas
    • Legal Malpractice
    • Copyright Law
    • Referrals For Legal Malpractice
    • Criminal Defense
  • Blog
  • Contact

Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC holds lawyers responsible for legal malpractice.

Websites confused about intellectual property ownership

On Behalf of Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC | Sep 18, 2018 | Intellectual Property Litigation

It is the dream of many New York musicians and songwriters to create a legacy of music that will live for generations. Most composers find it flattering when other musicians cover their songs in concert or on recordings. Composers of the classical genre may never have imagined how long their music would thrive or how many musicians would honor them with performances of their songs. Unfortunately, some of those musicians are finding themselves facing intellectual property disputes because of content filtering systems used by many websites.

Content filtering systems on YouTube and Facebook locate copyrighted material that members post on their pages, and flag them as violations. While music in the classical genre is often in the public domain, record companies own the modern recordings of those pieces. Recently, a classical pianist posted on Facebook a video of himself playing a piece by Bach, which was then flagged by the website’s filtering system. Sony Music Global then sent the musician a notice of copyright infringement.

The problem is that so many performances of classical pieces sound familiar if they are true to the original composition. While Sony may own the rights to a specific Bach recording, website filtering systems cannot tell the difference between two similar performances. Apparently, the same is true for similar photographs or pieces of writing on similar topics. One writer even received a copyright violation notice for quoting himself on Facebook.

Technology can be helpful in protecting the rights of composers, artists, writers and others. However, it may also lead to disputes and hassles when copyright owners rely entirely on filtering systems that are not able to detect when intellectual property is in the public domain. Those in New York who are dealing with similar disputes over the ownership of creative material may benefit from seeking the advice of an attorney.

Categories

  • Copyright Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Legal Malpractice

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Continuous representation doctrine and NY legal malpractice lawsuits
  • Is avoiding use of AI legal malpractice?
  • 2 common examples of legal malpractice in real estate matters
  • Does a missed deadline automatically mean legal malpractice?
  • Legal billing hours fraud: What wronged clients need to know

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC
NEW YORK
134 W. 29th Street, Suite 1001
New York, NY 10001-5304

New York Office

PHONE
917-338-3879

FAX
212-714-1264

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
Review Us

Send Us An Email

Attorney Advertising

© 2026 Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw