Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC

Call Us With Your Questions

917-338-3879
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Matthew F. Schwartz
    • John Ponterio
  • Practice Areas
    • Legal Malpractice
    • Copyright Law
    • Referrals For Legal Malpractice
    • Criminal Defense
  • Blog
  • Contact
Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC
917-338-3879
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Matthew F. Schwartz
    • John Ponterio
  • Practice Areas
    • Legal Malpractice
    • Copyright Law
    • Referrals For Legal Malpractice
    • Criminal Defense
  • Blog
  • Contact

Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC holds lawyers responsible for legal malpractice.

Disney says ‘No worries’ about intellectual property claims

On Behalf of Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC | Dec 31, 2018 | Intellectual Property

Intellectual property law is complex to begin with, but certain claims often create a gray area that requires legal action to clarify. Intellectual property law, including trademarks and patents, allows one person or group to take legal action if someone else attempts to use and profit from a protected work. Trademark protection includes items such as a symbol, design or word that identifies the product. However, it may not always be clear how far that protection may go.

While most claims of trademark violation involve a financial interest, some entities have attempted to trademark words or phrases that are precious to groups for reasons other than money. For example, New York fans of Disney’s “The Lion King” may enjoy singing along with the song “Hakuna Matata,” a Swahili phrase that Disney trademarked 24 years ago. However, Zimbabwean activists now say Disney had no right to claim this phrase and that capitalizing on it is an insult to the Swahili people.

Disney spokespeople explain that the trademark registration for “Hakuna Matata” does not prevent anyone from using the words, which roughly mean “no problem” in English. The trademark protection is limited to T-shirts that contain references to “The Lion King.” Disney also contests that other words, such as “Yahoo” and “Merry Christmas,” have similar trademark protections within limited contexts. Nevertheless, opponents of the trademark say it speaks to the broader question of the exploitation of Africa.

Because the nuances of intellectual property law can be subtle and complex, it may be difficult to know the proper course of action when faced with a dispute. Whether one is seeking trademark protection or concerned that someone is violating such a protection, it may be best to obtain a legal consultation. A New York attorney can review the circumstances and advise one on the most appropriate course of action.

Categories

  • Copyright Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Legal Malpractice

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Continuous representation doctrine and NY legal malpractice lawsuits
  • Is avoiding use of AI legal malpractice?
  • 2 common examples of legal malpractice in real estate matters
  • Does a missed deadline automatically mean legal malpractice?
  • Legal billing hours fraud: What wronged clients need to know

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC
NEW YORK
134 W. 29th Street, Suite 1001
New York, NY 10001-5304

New York Office

PHONE
917-338-3879

FAX
212-714-1264

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
Review Us

Send Us An Email

Attorney Advertising

© 2026 Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw