Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC

Call Us With Your Questions

917-338-3879
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Matthew F. Schwartz
    • John Ponterio
  • Practice Areas
    • Legal Malpractice
    • Copyright Law
    • Referrals For Legal Malpractice
    • Criminal Defense
  • Blog
  • Contact
Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC
917-338-3879
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Matthew F. Schwartz
    • John Ponterio
  • Practice Areas
    • Legal Malpractice
    • Copyright Law
    • Referrals For Legal Malpractice
    • Criminal Defense
  • Blog
  • Contact

Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC holds lawyers responsible for legal malpractice.

Could AI use lead to legal malpractice claims?

On Behalf of Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC | Sep 17, 2024 | Legal Malpractice

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being used in almost every industry to some degree, and the legal field is no exception.

There’s no question that AI can be useful to lawyers. It can be used to help dig through piles of legal research, analyze lengthy contracts and even make case management more efficient. However, AI is not without its pitfalls, and industry insiders say that the incorrect use of AI is likely to lead to malpractice claims in the near future.

The use of AI by lawyers is not without controversy

In general, the risk that AI could be tied to malpractice is tied closely to how it ends up being used by any given attorney. Lawyers are obligated to make sure that they supervise the work being done on behalf of their clients, whether that’s by a paralegal or a computer. If an attorney relies too heavily on AI to do their work – perhaps prioritizing speed above all – they may fail to be reasonably diligent on their client’s behalf.

Here are some of the key ways it can happen:

  • Errors in research or document review: AI systems can analyze huge amounts of case law, dig through statutes and pick apart legal documents, but they’re not infallible. For example, an AI tool could miss a controlling precedent that applies to a specific case, and that could lead to a loss in court.
  • Release of privileged communications: AI tools may frequently be used to categorize electronic documents during the discovery process of a case – but the computer may fail to recognize certain privileged communications. If those are exposed, the client’s privacy (and their cause) may suffer from the breach in communications.
  • Biased algorithms and bad predictions: The existing data that AI systems learn from can be biased, which means that predictions based on that data can also be tilted. If an AI system is used to make predictions about a case’s chances of success or assess legal risks and it produces biased results, that could lead to guidance and decisions that unfairly disadvantage certain clients.

Finally, clients deserve to know exactly how much an attorney relies on AI in their practice. If you’ve been deceived by your attorney and you’ve suffered a loss as a result, it may be time to explore your additional options for redress.

Categories

  • Copyright Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Legal Malpractice

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Continuous representation doctrine and NY legal malpractice lawsuits
  • Is avoiding use of AI legal malpractice?
  • 2 common examples of legal malpractice in real estate matters
  • Does a missed deadline automatically mean legal malpractice?
  • Legal billing hours fraud: What wronged clients need to know

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC
NEW YORK
134 W. 29th Street, Suite 1001
New York, NY 10001-5304

New York Office

PHONE
917-338-3879

FAX
212-714-1264

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
Review Us

Send Us An Email

Attorney Advertising

© 2026 Schwartz & Ponterio, PLLC • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw